Eshaan Bansal

#### Rough explanation of a solution I had in mind: We could replace the dataclasses with django models like so: ```python3 class Plugin(models.Model): # applies to both Analyzer and Connector...

This issue was tracking 2 different feature requests together which was creating confusion so I splitted it into 2 issues as these can be independently worked upon: - #433 -...

1. Did not add monkeypatches in `cymru` and `tor` because I thought we wanted to _actually_ check that the tor downloader works (or I think they somehow got missed between...

After discussing more on this issue and the implementation that was tried in #927, we have come to the conclusion that we do not want to add extra parameters to...

@0x0elliot - I like how well you articulated the potential issues/considerations that have to be taken care of as we implement this feature. These are issues that I have thought...

> allow user to save/create new playbooks from the GUI. > Would this function just append to the playbook_configuration.json file? This does feel a bit hacky > I think that,...

Hey, @pynixadm. Regarding 3rd point, You can checkout the latest [**v1.5.0**](https://github.com/intelowlproject/IntelOwl/releases/tag/v1.5.0) release. We have added a way to change analyzers configuration when requesting scan.

This requires: - making a configuration file for mypy - adding mypy action to our lint pipeline in the CI - fixing existing and adding type hints everywhere in the...

You are right but the issue #341 needs to be solved prior to working on this.

Was this closed by https://github.com/intelowlproject/IntelOwl/pull/552 ? @0ssigeno