Erik Rose
Erik Rose
Yes, I want to deprecate regexes and build them myself out of Ford-style syntax. Regexes were just a way to get to a working product faster.
I'm probably going to keep the = signs, though; they're easier to type and, I think, easier to read for Python people. I did a survey of PEG libs before...
I'd consider supporting `
Working on this right now. :-)
Ended up hitting a mysterious non-parsing grammar while writing the first test case and then spending the rest of the day working on a graphical grammer debugger. But I guess...
I keep coming back to it but haven't had any luck yet; it basically amounts to rewriting the grammar grammar. Someday I intend to get it right, but I can't...
In the meantime, you can certainly work around it with parentheses.
Here, I've pushed the branch with my work so far: https://github.com/erikrose/parsimonious/tree/lower-precedence-ors. I don't promise it makes sense, but, if anyone wants to tinker with it, you're welcome. As the 2nd-last...
@kootenpv It looks like you're in good hands here, and, like the other commenters, I'm not sure I have a handle on what you're trying to do, but I did...
How do you feel about `> requirements.txt`? I suppose that leaves Windows users out in the cold.