Erik Rasmussen

Can you describe your use case further? If an array field becomes empty, i.e. `''`, it should be removed from the array?

The reason is that this library is just a wrapper for `Field`, and `Field`, for good reason, keeps additional props out of the `input` object. To accomplish what you're asking...

I took a look at the test on #10, and while I haven't yet figured a way to make it pass, I've been playing with this "both or several" checkboxes...

What you're doing, though, is not rendering, it's adding some logic to the data flow. The "calculated fields" thing is just listening for changes on a field and updating other...

It, by design, does not allow setting values for fields that are not registered. You have fields that are not registered for which you would like to modify the value?

What if `jest` had some sort of syntax like: ```jsx expect(() => { TestUtils.renderIntoDocument() }) .toThrow(/Bad developer!/) .andCatch() //

For all of you using `redux-saga`, perhaps [check out this tool I just built](https://medium.com/@erikras/getting-a-promise-from-redux-actions-d92787894368) to convert actions into a `Promise` for libraries like `redux-form`.

Well, darn. That's what I get for being clever about it. Thanks.

That is pretty bananas! Can anyone else confirm this? If you put a `console.log(value)` into the `toUpper()` function, I assume you would get `h`, `HHe`, and `HHEHHEl`?

Thanks for that, @davidkpiano. Redux Form is only special casing React Native when getting the value from the event. This is the first I'm hearing that `onChange` is different. If...