Eric Mueller

I think the memory issue is because we weren't updating the ONE_D pointer after allocating the particles in part.f90. So it was possible for it to no longer point to...

Some incremental progress, just on making sure the correct mass of particle is created (forgetting the second reaction for now)... something which I think can cause an issue is that...

I agree this is a pretty extreme example. My only thought is that the error from zeroing PART_MASS could be much greater than that of say M_DOT_G_PP_X, because the user...

gotcha - I just had done a quick search for cases testing NU_PART and when I saw it wasn't actually generating the particle I wasn't sure

I wonder if it is better not to hard code a default `MOISTURE` reaction and just throw an error if `MOISTURE FRACTION` is used without `MOISTURE` being defined? Also, should...

Okay, besides maybe tweaking the hard-coded H_R to this value, I think we can close this (and consider the idea of no longer hard-coding moisture). I do think it is...

Not surprised - the ignition has been known to be a big issue here and I think was tuned to get good results in previous cases (acknowledging that the representation...

I simulated with an 800C ignitor, based on Jason's plot. The alternate char model changes the peak and gives a slightly longer tail but the change in shape predates this....

I'm still looking into the relative effects of the ignition and pyrolysis model ...but I'm also wondering, @drjfloyd, with `WATER_VAPOR` being included in `THERMO_DATA`, does it make sense to automatically...

Okay - definitely seems more trouble than it's worth, particularly if it's only for this one particular case.