Erick de Azevedo Lima

I stumble in theses kind of errors when I use "$this->whatever" inside a closure, because the linter has no way of knowing where the closure will be binded at that...

The PSR-11 version 2.0.0 added the bool return type to the has method of the ContainerInterface; https://github.com/php-fig/container/releases/tag/2.0.0 Does this have any incompatibilities with current implementation? I think a change could...

> Change in plans: I will investigate shipping all _major_ versions of each PSR simultaneously, selectable via an INI setting. > > For example we will define `PsrExt\Cache\v1\CacheInterface`, `PsrExt\Cache\v2\CacheInterface`, `PsrExt\Cache\v3\CacheInterface`....

Hey, @allebb . Do you still intend to implement this? Thanks.

Hello. I'm kind a dinossaur when it comes to testing. Anyway, I've attached a whole test case. If you need anything else, just let me know. [zend-code-bug-test-ericklima.comp_2018.04.17.zip](https://github.com/zendframework/zend-code/files/1921635/zend-code-bug-test-ericklima.comp_2018.04.17.zip)

@Ocramius . Here it is! https://gist.github.com/ericklima-comp/bb32e0b9ec1a7ad9c430a201a96d5c3f

+1. With each passing day, it gets harder to find non-PSR-12 code. Netbeans is wonderful, but you cannot use it out of the box if you work in a team...

Hi guys! Is there any plan on implementing this? I dare to say that one cannot code modern PHP app with Netbeans without having PSR-12 support nowadays.

It seems we have (most of) the options to adhere to the per coding-style. Noob question: Is it hard to make these configs the default when you install the IDE?

I see. But can we get very close to PER coding style, right? If so, could we get this settings out of the box on NB? I mean, when we...