Eric Kao

I just ran into this issue and was about to file a new bug until I found this issue. My two cents is that `not f(input.x)` should evaluate to true....

Noting another "crazy" consequence of this behavior: Assume `input.x` is undefined. Then `a` succeeds but `b` fails in the rules below because the second one gets re-written with a separate...

Want to note that there are some potentially very confusing behaviors coming with allowing `not` in more places as proposed. `not` is very unique in its definition/behavior. not of true,...

> > Want to note that there are some potentially very confusing behaviors coming with allowing not in more places as proposed. > > `not` is very unique in its...

+1 on the benefits of both readability and having a form which tolerates undefined input! Here are a couple considerations/opinions I'd like to write down which might help us in...