Yuri Mizushima

@poorbarcode Addressed. PTAL

@poorbarcode Could you take a look?

@poorbarcode Thank you for your clarification. * [1] Yes. * [2] Partially yes. However, I think the main point of this PR is the change in the timing of getting...

@poorbarcode * [Q-1] Yes. * [Q-2] When I created this PR, I introduced Map structure because it was necessary. For more details, please see the description("2. Keep the last sent...

@eolivelli Thank you for your comments. I'll check it. By the way, do you have any comments about the following concern from @poorbarcode ? > By the way, if there...

I opened a new PR https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21953.

https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21953 was merged.

@codelipenghui Sorry for the late reply. If user defines custom authz provider and follow `namespaceName=null, policy=PolicyName.ANTI_AFFINITY, operation=PolicyOperation.READ` as correct state, they should change definition when updating the version. Therefore, we...

One of the alternative approaches is using an existing definition of operation. For example, validate `TenantOperation.LIST_NAMESPACES` for a tenant and `PolicyName.ANTI_AFFINITY, PolicyOperation.READ` for each namespace. https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/8c8738f26cad0edf91d6b97f4c103680517900d9/pulsar-broker/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/broker/admin/impl/NamespacesBase.java#L1886 https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/8c8738f26cad0edf91d6b97f4c103680517900d9/pulsar-broker/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/broker/admin/impl/NamespacesBase.java#L1888-L1898 This approach doesn't...

@codelipenghui Could you check these comments please?