EpiNow2
EpiNow2 copied to clipboard
New maintainer
Would anyone - especially someone already funded to do EpiNow2
development (i.e @sbfnk or @jamesmbaazam) be interested in taking over as a maintainer?
I think I need to take a step back from this due to ongoing issues getting support to put time into this and more generally being disconnected from the current development goals which I think is making acting as a maintainer difficult.
I expect to still be implementing features and I am happy to contribute reviews and comment on design decisions. I am also open to having a discussion as to whether it would be best for me to stay as the designated maintainer/CODEOWNER.
Yes, can definitely do if you feel it's a drain - and happy to handle the upcoming CRAN submission if you prefer.
One potential consideration could be co-maintainership? Although I'm not entirely sure how this works.
Yes, can definitely do if you feel it's a drain
Great
Although I'm not entirely sure how this works.
In the CRAN sense?
Although I'm not entirely sure how this works.
In the CRAN sense?
Yes - or in any sense really.
There is no formal way to declare co-maintainership. In particular, CRAN policy are explicit that there needs to be a single point of contact with them.
In practice, co-maintainership works pretty much the way you've work for the past months (or more) as far as I can tell:
- maintainers discuss issues and review PR together and give input for important changes to the package.
- releases are announced and coordinated by the official maintainer via
usethis::use_release_issue()
If you want some examples of co-maintainership: https://github.com/r-lib/lintr (https://github.com/r-lib/lintr/pull/2529 & https://github.com/r-lib/lintr/issues/2392#issuecomment-2011292190); https://github.com/Rdatatable/data.table
If you want ways to announce this co-maintainership to potential contributors, I would recommend you do it in one of these places:
-
CODEOWNERS
-
GOVERNANCE.md
-
README.md
Thanks @Bisaloo.