enthudave
enthudave
That last comment can be taken with a grain of salt. It offers some functionality this one doesn't but it has the exact same problem with the alternate buffer, when...
yeah yeah, but when you make that comment you are clearly encouraging others to use that one. I believe they shouldn't for the reasons I've stated, and if not for...
mmm, as you know I'm still learning git(hub), that 'review' was meant to accompany commit 91bdf17 about tempname()
I'm not sure what to do when the user edits a directory but doesn't choose a file. In light of your decision to not consider the directory buffer for the...
I don't think we can rely on the buffer numbers, that would work in this simple example, but I __think__ the buffer numbers do not represent the order in which...
If there's a function that returns a list of the order in which buffers have been visited for the current session or something that would be exactly what we need
That is quite similar to the workaround I had in my mind, except that I wasn't thinking to use a timestamp, just a window variable (w:old_alternate) to set on BufLeave...
mmm, one small issue I spotted, and testing confirmed, scenario: open vim, open a file, split window, open another file, call any of the 'new tab edit' commands, choose a...
might i suggest a wild idea? It's been discussed in PR #4 , just open ranger in a new tab, both problems we are currently trying to solve would disappear,...
I think that line 170 with the s:std_in variable can be removed as it was in master