enketo-express
enketo-express copied to clipboard
enketo
The full-fledged Enketo web application for the ODK ecosystem
as discussed here: https://www.flowdock.com/app/kobotoolbox/enketo/threads/6SNVMAR_i9rztcVzF14rdE5GYP3 ``` 20:34:21 0|enketo | TypeError: /srv/src/enketo_express/app/views/layout.pug:2 20:34:21 0|enketo | 1| doctype html 20:34:21 0|enketo | > 2| html(manifest=manifest, lang=language, dir=dir(language)) 20:34:21 0|enketo | 3| head 20:34:21...
**Describe the bug** When printing a question/survey form with a long list of choices in PDF (in Chrome) it works perfectly. But the same behaves differently when printing in Mozilla...
_From @MartijnR on June 20, 2018 22:19_ Unintended side-effect. Not so serious, I think. _Copied from original issue: kobotoolbox/enketo-express#1066_
Hi @MartijnR, some people are copying text from PDFs that contains old ASCII control characters and pasting it as responses to questions. I'm guessing that, depending on their platform, these...
Use case: 1. user A loads offline-capable form, enters data, submits et 2. user A logs out 3. user B works on same device/browser, and opens form expected: login screen...
Bold doesn't work so well. * [ ] move important config items (and the group they are in) to the top * [ ] perhaps output a more obvious style...
_From @MartijnR on March 11, 2016 15:24_ Useful to deal with a situation, which shouldn't be possible, when a form is updated in an incompatible manner, e.g. the root node...
Depends on #161. When the app is built during image creation the bundle can be copied over to a fresh image that doesn't have `node_modules` and build system deps.
As data collection is moving increasingly online at this time, I noticed that there is a second part to the GUI issue which especially affects people in lower bandwidth locations...
_From @MartijnR on February 16, 2016 20:32_ to fix afterwards: - [ ] remove awkward method of passing submission parameter to offline view _Originally posted by @enketo-issue-mover in https://github.com/enketo/enketo-express/issues/55#issuecomment-433235298_