Thomas E Enebo

@headius I think this is reasonable and this is not the first time people have been messed up with JSR223 attribute bindings. The only downside of this is assumption that...

@tiramisubliss If you cannot update to 9.3.x can you try 9.2.21.0. That is nearly 2 years of fixes over 9.2.12.0. Not sure if something changed in our FFI bindings but...

@headius yes. This works if we change rubygems core_ext of Kernel#warn. A PR is still needed there. I am keepign this open until I make something.

https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/pull/6002 is the pull request which needs to be merged and released for us to land this PR.

@ccutrer Perhaps we can flesh out this idea a bit more? If you evaluate some ruby code at that point you enumerate bindings and then only convert those? More specifically...

@ccutrer Can you open up a new issue on this? I think this should be pretty doable. It would definitely give more flexibility to just using jsr223 instead of forcing...

@eregon grammar and lexer should be finished up to 3.0.2 barring mistakes/bugs. I think perhaps warning subsystem stuff might need tweaks but that would only affect us. since you replace...

@eregon I think this sounds like a lot of work and is pretty ambitious. If you want to play with these ideas jruby-parser might be the right place. I can...

> I think the parser inside JRuby already includes column information now, right? It keeps track of columns during parsing itself but does not retain that in the AST. That...

@headius I forgot I did look into this for about 3-4 minutes. I can tell you we get the name of the __FILE__ from what is passed into parser. So...