Evgeniy Naydanov
Evgeniy Naydanov
breakpoint_add should use rtos only if request is done by gdb. If multiple targets are specified as -rtos , the rtos_update_threads was called only if the last target was specified...
There are two entries in table 10 (5.3. Priority) data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/979e0/979e0f2b8f4ae9e5f15702f91c5e8a05bb667c24" alt="image" and data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff04c/ff04c57c23075ad5226264bf80082b0e584e4d2c" alt="image" AFAIK, both these entries specify the priority for `mcontrol/mcontrol6 load data before` (the second one explitly, the first...
What is the correct value of `aarsize` when accessing `CSR_FRM` or `CSR_FFLAGS` ? As stated in the spec: > If aarsize specifies a size larger than the register’s actual size,...
According to the RISC-V Debug Spec (1.0.0-rc1)[3.7 Abstract Commands]: > While an abstract command is executing (busy in abstractcs is high), a debugger must not change hartsel, and must not...
This would eliminate the need for an extra nop in-between the two reads in case of a 64-bit register.
Prior to the commit, it was impossible to get a `dmi.busy` responce on a scan in a batch that was not the first scan in the batch. Change-Id: Ib0714ecaf7d2e11878140d16d9aa6152ff20f1e9
This allows to merge the implementation in `batch.c` with the one in `riscv-013.c`. Change-Id: Ic3821a9ce2d75a7c6e618074679595ddefb14cfc
After the most recent merge #976 the difference with upstream version used looks like so (some differences are omitted): ``` > git checkout 1f512eac32e614e893565741f93ea3739a522797 ... > git diff d4575b647a3603200a9bb4a784d170f792ab88d0 --stat...
It is needed since `register_read_direct` relies on `target->state` to work correctly. [The change, introducing the issue](https://github.com/riscv/riscv-openocd/pull/842/files#diff-701864e2be3210275085c84b8f6fa7f9eb6171a2a18ca71638be42a155c08c63R1760-R1769). There are two sullutions suggested so far: * [Using `riscv_halt_reason` and `set_debug_reason`](https://github.com/riscv/riscv-openocd/pull/842#discussion_r1183104333). * Using...