Eric Thompson

Yes, sorry I hadn't responded back yet. Thank you for the help on this.

I think some of the difficulty is that we never fully migrated to pathlib from os. So in some places we need the string representation of the path, and that...

I think I'm going to have to deal with this as part of #1005/#1028. In cleaning up the test data, I realized there was some duplicated code in different places...

I don't think this is a bug, so I removed that label. Also, I think this was largely resolved in #1028.

I think we are getting pretty close to moving to gitlab. Also, I'm thinking some of these steps are overkill. For [groundfailure](https://github.com/usgs/groundfailure), we just sent in a merge that deletes...

It does not appear that there is a warning. However, I think that the fact that all functional code has been removed from the repo would prevent anyone from accidentally...

Assigning to @smithj382 because he said he has looked at this.

@baagaard-usgs I fully support this idea. To try to get this done as efficiently as possible, I think we need to try to develop a plan to divvy up tasks.

@hadigh I just want to clarify: You want this as a metric, e.g., the max absolute amplitude of the Wood-Anderson response? Not the waveform doesn't need to be stored, right?

Additionally, we had bugs in how velocity and displacement were getting treated in the dmg v2 format. So I disabled those but I think it makes sense to address this...