emixa-d

(Well, `signal-condition!`, whatever.)

Alt., do the pipe trick. Though I think the main issue here is that the parameterize doesn't cover the root-service, register-services and with-service-register stuff. (The async stuff is problematic, but...

Op 17-12-2023 om 00:57 schreef Attila Lendvai: > @emixa-d wow, indeed! i never thought > switching them up would make a difference. i only moved the > |root-service| stuff inside...

What issues would these be? Is this for performance only (cache locality etc.), or any bugs?

>When working with multiple fibers and ports, disabling work-stealing makes it easier to ensure only one thread is accessing a given port. > Ran into bugs when multiple threads accessed...

As the new version of #42 is merged, I'm assuming this can be closed (if not, just add an appropriate comment; GitHub restricts reopening).

> I think this should probably be closed in favor of #42. And are you going to?

I've rebased it in . Assuming no negative review (and assuming I don't forget), I intend to merge it after 5 days.

> I've rebased it in #95. Assuming no negative review (and assuming I don't forget), I intend to merge it after 5 days. Nevermind about #95, looks like I can...

How about ``` (define (try-operation operation) "Return #false on failure, or a thunk returning [...] on success." ...) ``` instead? It's more general.