emixa-d

> do I understand correctly that this fix would not add any new API, just fix a problem with the current implementation? Or is `(fibers timer-wheel)` also public? No. It...

> > I don't expect anyone to bring an implementation for `withNack` in Fibers anytime soon > > It's not for me to say what the goal of Fibers should...

Apparently it doesn't have SOCK_NONBLOCK & SOCK_CLOEXEC () Proposed solution: define procedures like > (define accept/non-block+cloexec > (if (and (defined? 'SOCK_NONBLOCK) (defined? 'SOCK_CLOEXEC)) > (lambda (port) (accept port (logior SOCK_NONBLOCK...

> fibers master branch It's better to include the commit id, since what the branch points to changes over time.

(Assigning the ... assignment based on what's happening)

There's no bug report here and the question has been answered, so closing.

I guess what kevingranade is thinking of, is that most aircraft doesn't move the same way a ground vehicle or helicopter does, so you _can't_ simply abstract things, you need...

I would make `rotorcraft` (helicopter) be a special case of `rotorlike_aircraft` (helicopters behave like helicopters, after all). That would simply most checks (except the one at `// If a part...

> So instead of adding OR checks, I make the rotorlike_aircraft class include the rotorcraft class for most purposes and add checks looking for rotors in the code lines where...