Chris Elston
Chris Elston
> I suggest to put some more space between the rejected and the 0-starred icon and yet double that space between the rest of the 1-5 stars Putting the two...
@AlicVB that is indeed my primary concern, as also illustrated by @parafin's comment. I will say, though, that I'm also sceptical about the range selection widget as a concept. When...
@AxelG-DE this sounds more confusing to me. I think someone probably needs to mock up some proposals visually so we can understand the options better.
I agree, the second is best of the three options, though without the "zero star" icon it would be hard to know what is being represented. Unfortunately consistency would suggest...
> I fear that do not have stars will be worst to understand what is it. Sure. That's why I suggested a star icon as a label
I know it's not constructive and I'm not going to get sweary and angry, but I do agree that we've still not got something that's better than what's in 3.8.1.
> Yes, it's an issue but this design also allow to do selections with 1 click instead of 2 or 4 on previous one The question is: have we gained...
> I think selection (for edit or export) should rely on click/arraw only, and hover should only be used to display transient info (read-only) like metadata. Mouseover should be ditched...
There are also probably some view-specific special cases we need to consider. For example - If a single image is selected but it's not currently visible, perhaps operations should not...
I'd be interested to know what 'Active' means in the table above.