Elvis Pranskevichus
Elvis Pranskevichus
The introspection query isn't _that_ complex and typically runs in under a millisecond on regular Postgres. This is something you might want to raise with Cockroach Labs people.
> the down side is that we lose the raw SQL stats data for all. But we don't have to, do we? If we don't recognize a query as being...
Plausible. I'm not a fan of changing the function signature based on the argument though. I think this should be a separate method, e.g. `fetchmany` or something like that (though...
Ability to return values added as `fetchmany` in #1175.
Hi @divan! How are you hosting EdgeDB? If you're using a self-hosted Postgres, you might want to look into bumping [`max_pred_locks_per_transaction`](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/runtime-config-locks.html#GUC-MAX-PRED-LOCKS-PER-TRANSACTION), and perhaps also `max_pred_locks_per_page` and/or `max_pred_locks_per_relation`. Additionally, check if...
@1st1, I'm not sure there is a way to achieve this at the typing level currently. We generate the signature for `select` in generated models, there is no general way...
There are tests for this in CI (which are passing), so this must be coming from your venv. Are you installing gel-python in editable mode?
We plan to switch to UUIDv7 once it's standardized and available in the backend.
> we probably need another schema-level annotation Arguably a `str` subtype fits better here.
Yeah, the CLI does it's own parsing, but proper EdegQL literals should be supported whenever the input is unambiguous.