Erik Moeller
Erik Moeller
Definitely seems useful and 🤞 should be quick, keeping on backlog, but we may have to timebox it.
@cfm I could use your help in re-scoping this issue - especially since the dependency story for the client (app) will change with the rewrite. Is this still worth pursuing...
Discussed during backlog review, we agreed that this is potentially worthy of further investigation to ensure we have better coverage for integration testing.
Closing, developer quality-of-life specific to the current codebase.
Discussed in backlog review today. We do have types for many signals/slots now, but as with #25 (mypy type checks), it would be good to have a static check to...
Closing, non-critical issue specific to the current codebase, which is undergoing a rewrite.
@cfm I think this can be closed now and considered in the context of #2471 - do you agree?
I would recommend scoping a smaller (but still quite sizable!) issue to add preview to the application as-is, without changing viewer/editor defaults. This would give us the opportunity to explore...
Still an open Q: is a single page preview (just the first page) "good enough" to already add significant value for the user?
This is likely applicable as written to the client rewrite; we had a preliminary discussion about exactly this in a recent UX check-in. Keeping open for now, but it may...