Markus Elfring

>I recommend you use a regex for matching lexical patterns like these. I know some data processing possibilities also together with regular expressions. But the reference documentation is providing the...

>… and adding a scripting language with functions/macros … I suggest to clarify this view a bit more. >…, that can be consumed by a script or external program I...

Do you find another search approach reasonable for such an use case? ``` [Markus_Elfring@fedora lokal]$ printf 'else:\n X\n' | ./comby -stdin -stdout -matcher .py 'else::[_\n]:[~\s+]X' Success Success ```

Will the following test result trigger also any further software development considerations? :thinking: ``` [Markus_Elfring@fedora lokal]$ printf ' if active:\n X\n' | ./comby -stdin -stdout -matcher .py ':[ indentation]:[check~if active]::[_\n]:[...

>I take it you're familiar with spatch … You can see from published development activities that I am working also with the semantic patch language (Coccinelle software) for a few...

I am struggling with software development challenges also together with the programming language “OCaml". So I tend to pick opportunities up for improvements in other areas.

I found a few update candidates by [a small source code review](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_review "Description for code review").

I find it safer to split desirable changes according to different issues. 🤔

Thanks for a small wording adjustment. ----- 💭 Would you like to [follow C++ Core Guidelines](https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/444704f703a40aa1295605f0ef70d94615376034/CppCoreGuidelines.md#Rr-newdelete "R.11: Avoid calling new and delete explicitly") any more?

💭 I suggest to take another look at [available information sources](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%2B%2B11#General-purpose_smart_pointers "Description for C++11"). How do you think about to improve source code analysis accordingly? 🤔