Markus Elfring

Thanks for [your small source code improvement](https://github.com/eriknyquist/librxvm/commit/54e78752c84e3bb1ca0a93dcae9186d035281a2e "Remove unnecessary null pointer checks before free()"). Were [any update candidates left over](https://github.com/eriknyquist/librxvm/blob/cae348f74edbd28879745d5e09ac2f9d0571d2ec/librxvm/rxvm.c#L561 "Update candidate: rxvm_free()") for such a change pattern?

How do you think about to integrate the following small change? ```diff for (i = 0; i < compiled->size; i++) { - if (compiled->exe[i].ccs != NULL) - free(compiled->exe[i].ccs); + free(compiled->exe[i].ccs);...

Thanks for [your adjustment of affected include guards](https://github.com/eriknyquist/librxvm/commit/8f04d2115ae80fa12c321e749a0822428cf50667 "Use include guards that cannot clash with #defs from libc"). I would appreciate if these identifiers will not only become [standard compliant](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/228783/what-are-the-rules-about-using-an-underscore-in-a-c-identifier#answer-228797...

- How do you think about to improve [static source code analysis](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tools_for_static_code_analysis#C.2C_C.2B.2B "Tools for static code analysis") also for your software? - Are you interested to apply [aspect-oriented software development](https://aspectc.org/...

:thought_balloon: It would be nice if you can integrate such small source code adjustments also directly (if you find them acceptable). Should any implementation details be reconsidered once more?

Will [another report](https://github.com/canonical/lightdm/issues/205 "Disabling \"Draw user backgrounds\" does not come to effect") trigger further development and configuration considerations accordingly?

> It's possible that your lightdm-gtk-greeter.conf file is not being read. Why would such a questionable software behaviour happen (while I could look at available settings by some tools)? :thinking:

:thinking: * Can such information be clarified any further? * Would you like to share more experiences about questionable behaviour in affected software areas?

>To summarize, if the settings are not applying but you are using the versions of the software packaged by … Did you hear about any related open issues (and corresponding...

:thought_balloon: I hope that software distributions will improve their packages (also for this issue).