Barthélémy Ledoux

Results 184 comments of Barthélémy Ledoux

I think the safest is option 4 with a fallback to option 2. This way everything stays affordable and we don't have an insignificant blob of code in the `name`...

Thank you for your input @sawmurai Would you have time to create a quick PR? Even writing failing tests would help.

Hello @carlwhittick Thank you for reporting this unexpected behavior. ## Workaround You can, without updating any package, work around this issue: Replace in your examples the previous name of your...

@T0RAT0RA that's awesome! Would you be open to documenting it in the cookbook? It would probably help anybody find the answer they seek. If you are, fork the project, open...

Thank you @rfrey-imb I think you just put your finger on the reason this issue is not closed yet.

Hello @frn-dawn and thank you for this suggestion. To interpret the code without access to a node server we use [Bublejs](https://github.com/bublejs/buble) within the browser instead of a loader of a...

Hello @snakemastr, That is an interesting idea. What would this tag look like in the documentation? A link to the other components documentation? Where would you expect this link to...

I remember @davatron5000 talking about this kind of feature being useful in Austin TX. We might even be able to go one step further and automatically extract which components are...

Hi @ozum, Great question. A short answer would be: No, but we want to. With the new composition API, explicitly specified props are still valid and useful. Those will work...