Elena Ranguelova

Dear @sara-02 and @Athene-ai thank you for your reviews. @taless474 I see that some check-boxes are not checked from both of the reviewers and @Athene-ai gave some comments, though very...

> @elboyran For me, the paper content is acceptable. I have an issue that my automated tests failed. I will create an issue to follow up. The installation setup worked...

> > @elboyran For me, the paper content is acceptable. I have an issue that my automated tests failed. I will create an issue to follow up. The installation setup...

> **More comments**: > > _Installation: Does installation proceed as outlined in the documentation?_ : The reviewer suggests improving this part of the paper to explain in more details the...

> Sure @elboyran > > Here there are more comments > > _Quality of writing: Is the paper well written (i.e., it does not require editing for structure, language, or...

> English language @Athene-ai, could you, please, give me example sentence(s) where the English of the paper is not good?

All commits have  github badge!

Hello, is anybody looking at PRs for model contributions?

Adding things to the README should be balanced as removing things from there. I suggest the Getting started to be largely moved to the (new?) demo notebook. To be combined...

@cwmeijer if you know about more expected effects from changing the hyperparameters than given in WIllem's thesis and the related PR, please, add them in the Tutorial's README extension.