ek9

Hey guys, any plans to release this? Possible the monorepo migration could be done separately, so we can have the PHPSpec3 support? I'd be willing to help with any needed...

From my recent tests (in the past day) I believe the basic functionality is working correctly for the new versions after the subsplit merge + the namepsace fix ( #25...

I've made some issues and pulled some PRs for you to review / merge which should finalize most of the things. Please review / merge in this order to avoid...

Good point, I've made #40 issue for this.

@richardmiller @pocky To illustrate this better I have made a test repository: https://github.com/ek9/behatspec-test It has 2 branches: - `master` branch - using `dev-master` of BehatSpec, which works fine (except issue...

This PR would also make sure `phpspec2-support` branches history would be merged to `master` (so `phpspec2-support` can be removed in the future, but all it's history would remain in `master`...

Thanks for catching this. I've updated it accordingly. I am not sure if `rerunner` configuration pars needs to be there or not. If it must be there, then I believe...

In phpspec3 they changed the way you should write the configuration. The configuration should now be under extension's namespace instead, like this: ```yaml extensions: RMiller\BehatSpec\Extension\BehatSpecExtension\PhpSpecExtension: path: vendor/bin/phpspec commands: [describe, exemplify,...

@richardmiller I've got some time and tested the current `master` branch. I've issued 2 more commits: 1. I have update the README regarding `rerunner` configuration. It does not have to...

I am using exemplify and behat-spec, so I guess all?