Eric Huss

It's hard for me to predict if people will have any issues. I think it's fine to leave it as-is unless you want to change it. It can always be...

I think it would be great to have clearer information. I think that one of the installation pages had screenshots at one point, but I don't remember where that was....

I don't think there is any momentum to have a centralized set of installation directions, so I wouldn't wait on that. I can also feel my own distaste for such...

I was meaning that if a printed book points to a URL like https://rust-lang.github.io/rustup/installation/windows.html, and then in some point in the future that changes, mdbook can redirect that to the...

This looks to be an issue with your environment configuration and using gcc. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/38589886/sorry-unimplemented-64-bit-mode-not-compiled-in appears to have some suggestions for how to resolve it. This issue tracker is for [`rustup`](https://rust-lang.github.io/rustup/),...

I'm not sure there's anything rustfix can do here. It only works with the suggested spans from `rustc`, it has no knowledge of Rust syntax (it works on simple byte...

cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/51176

Diagnostics with multiple exclusive options shouldn't be marked as MachineApplicable (as rustfix obviously can't handle them). To handle this, rustfix would need to gain the ability to provide a user-interactive...

If you mean by a UI test, then you'll want to remove the `run-rustfix` header. That header will apply all suggestions ignoring the applicability. There's also `rustfix-only-machine-applicable`, but I don't...

I'd leave it open. Even though these types of suggestions aren't currently supported, it probably shouldn't panic.