ehmicky
ehmicky
Yes it would, so we can link to that separate issue.
@wesleytodd Sorry for putting this off-topic. I am just trying to separate those two separate issues (changing the default value and changing the documentation). Those are connected (I am going...
Note: there's also a related discussion at #394 about whether the `extendEnv` option default value should be `true` or `false`. I think the documentation can be changed regardless of #394....
#394 was closed since this issue is superseding it. Basically all we need is clarifying the `env` and `extendEnv` options. @lzhaki let us know what you think.
Is there a way for us to document our minimal TypeScript supported version?
I've done some quick search and it does not seem like TypeScript supports specifying minimal TypeScript version. As you say `typesVersions` is only meant for fallbacks. I don't think we...
Issue at https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/32166 Let's see what happens there first.
The guys at TypeScript are saying that supporting a minimal TypeScript version should be specified by using: ```json "typesVersions": { ">=3.4": { "*": ["index.d.ts"] } } ``` This should produce...
I would like @sindresorhus input on this. I think you meant `Readonly` not `ReadonlyArray` since we are using `readonly` on an `interface` not an array.
Yes sorry you're right. Still would need some feedback from @sindresorhus on this.