Ege Korkan

Moving one part of the discussion here. I think that the impact on the user is very important and maintenance should come second. > This is not true. What you...

The other question we had was "Why do we have a W3C license at the same?". @danielpeintner do you know why?

I think that overall it is important to differentiate what features of the partial TD given to the `produce()` function are exposed at the end. As a rule of thumb,...

I think what is really needed is also what to put in a package.json file of my own project and also how to include only one binding and not install...

I think that this generally an interesting point for HTTP Bindings everywhere. There is no built-in mechanism for eventing in HTTP or to be specific, no mechanism can be assumed...

I think allowing this kind of input from the node-wot users would start complicating stuff more than it should. The example I have seen here makes total sense but I...

> but what if you want to personalize stuff per thing? or even worst per form? Yes this would be a use case to need this but then: - Why...

So I think that the newcomer example Thing should show all affordance types, use no security, have all operation types, have as detailed data schemas as possible. We can agree...

There is also this part in the Contributing.md about this : https://github.com/eclipse/thingweb.node-wot/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pull-requests-and-feature-branches It is not exactly the same but some might be doing this while others are not. It would...

Also see https://github.com/eclipse/thingweb.node-wot/issues/559