Eemeli Aro

From what I could tell, you appear to be using moz-l10n-linter, but if there are others, that would be useful to know. I was actually hoping for more of a...

This has been fixed for quite a while now.

Actually, that's wrong; we don't use `eval()`, but we do use `new Function()` for this: https://github.com/mozilla/pontoon/blob/a0d0d9ab740cec8e837adbe28d4b8b7c25a08c64/translate/src/hooks/usePluralExamples.ts#L25-L26

With a caveat that in order to get there, we need to first complete the sync refactor, and that's going to include a first rewrite of the upload and download...

The challenge here is that the parsed Document representation does not retain the exact source positions of each comment, but only their attachment either on or before a value. In...

This monorepo currently hosts over a dozen packages, all of which are published as ECMAScript. But perhaps you're asking for their release as ES modules? If so, could you describe...

Overall, this seems like a problem in other tools, some of which are not able to tree-shake CommonJS dependencies as well as others. If you're interested in implementing parallel ES...

Ok, so to clarify, TypeScript users would not in fact specifically benefit from any packaging change. As for the assertion that an ES module packaging would result in a smaller...

Should we include some language encouraging implementations to sandbox or otherwise restrict the access of function handlers to external state?

The check could indeed be on just the primary subtag (e.g. `es` for `es-419`). These special cases are included to 1) support some languages that are not included yet in...