edsellar
edsellar
I went ahead and updated a branch with v2 of the mavlink spec. I ran into some initial build issues. Mainly in the mavlink.c file (line 100) as v2 spec...
Any thoughts on this? I’ve been tryin to use with PX4 (which is mavlink) and mav protocol v2 but the v2 is problematic with the current way the u360gts is...
Px4. And mavlink v2 is old so wondering why not update to v2 spec?
(Px4 stack on Pixhawk)
Then you should keep a branch with v2. Even if you select the protocol for the mav stream in each specific port (which you can do on px4 and qgroundcontrol)...
Great to hear that! Since there is no stable branch ever designated let’s just use master which has its last update 5 days ago. So just master as of today:...
Thanks Raul - you do some amazing stuff and I’m really happy to hear you’re willing to give this a try. It will make such a difference. I’m standing by...
Should we mark this as open. What's needed from here? Happy to assist if youd like.
If you want to give me a rough idea, I’ll start trying to implement this. Can I just replace the v1 library with v2?
Definitely don’t make this two step. That’s dangerous. Fat fingering is rare (I have never done it). List populating delay should never occur. Check hardware? Make it a toggle for...