The Open Journals editorial robot

Results 1714 comments of The Open Journals editorial robot

Hello @rkn2, here are the things you can ask me to do: ``` # List all available commands @editorialbot commands # Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles @editorialbot...

Checklists can only be created once the review has started in the review issue

Here's the current list of reviewers: https://bit.ly/jose-reviewers

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type: ``` @editorialbot...

**Software report:** ``` github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.03 s (1001.1 files/s, 120276.9 lines/s) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Language files blank comment code ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Python 11 228 138 1556 Markdown 2 94 0 328 CSV...

**Paper file info**: 📄 Wordcount for `paper.md` is **1098** ✅ The paper includes a `Statement of need` section

**License info**: 🟡 License found: `GNU Affero General Public License v3.0` ([Check here](https://opensource.org/licenses) for OSI approval)

:point_right::page_facing_up: [Download article proof](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openjournals/joss-papers/joss.06510/joss.06510/10.21105.joss.06510.pdf) :page_facing_up: [View article proof on GitHub](https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/blob/joss.06510/joss.06510/10.21105.joss.06510.pdf) :page_facing_up: :point_left:

``` Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification): OK DOIs - 10.1007/3-540-45848-4_59 is OK - 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.02.005 is OK - 10.1145/3183713.3190657 is OK - 10.1093/nar/gkab1028 is OK...