[PRE REVIEW]: Static Equilibrium in Remote Alaska

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @rkn2 (Rebecca Napolitano) Repository: https://github.com/rkn2/AK_statics Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Lorena Barba

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://jose.theoj.org/papers/4830f6c2e44c15ff926e3d0a94823a01"><img src="https://jose.theoj.org/papers/4830f6c2e44c15ff926e3d0a94823a01/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://jose.theoj.org/papers/4830f6c2e44c15ff926e3d0a94823a01/status.svg)](https://jose.theoj.org/papers/4830f6c2e44c15ff926e3d0a94823a01)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSE @rkn2. Currently, there isn't a JOSE editor assigned to your paper.

@rkn2 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSE submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.02 s (444.0 files/s, 201355.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jupyter Notebook                 7              0           3649           1021
Markdown                         2             48              0            139
TeX                              1              7              0            101
YAML                             1              1              4             18
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            11             56           3653           1279
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 2819

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- None

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1088/0031-9120/40/4/002 may be a valid DOI for title: Contextualized magnetism in secondary school: learning from the LHC (CERN)
- 10.1038/505477a may be a valid DOI for title: Education: Embed social awareness in science curricula
- 10.1109/fie.2014.7044106 may be a valid DOI for title: The people part of engineering: Engineering for, with, and as people
- 10.1007/s11191-021-00287-y may be a valid DOI for title: Integration of the topic of social justice into high school biology curricula

INVALID DOIs

- None

[rkn2]

Suggested reviewers: Nathan Moore (science education + physics + python); Satish Annigeri (civil engineering + python), Shahane Rodgers (social science + python)

[rkn2]

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello @rkn2, here are the things you can ask me to do:

# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands

# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors

# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist

# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set jose-paper as branch

# Run checks and provide information on the repository and the paper file
@editorialbot check repository

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references

# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf

# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint

# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers

[rkn2]

@editorialbot generate my checklist

[editorialbot]

Checklists can only be created once the review has started in the review issue

[rkn2]

@editorialbot list reviewers

[editorialbot]

Here's the current list of reviewers: https://bit.ly/jose-reviewers

[rkn2]

Hi @labarba I wanted to check back on this and make sure that this was not hung up on something on my end since this is my first time using this venue. Is there anything I need to do or is this just still in the process of going out to reviewers? Thanks!