Dirk Eddelbuettel

The issue here is related to a shortcoming in Rcpp but as the two preceding links (to issue and now merged PR) show, it has been taken care of. I...

Version 0.3.12 is now on CRAN so this can be closed.

Thanks for putting this together! I can (and will) turn on the reverse-depends machinery but as that does not generally involve `compilerAttributes()` etc it will not be complete. But if...

Wheeee ==:-) Almost worse :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye: That should work. :crossed_fingers:

Thumbs up on more informative message. 'That file' is technically a policy violation anyway (via a trick borrowed, if memory serves, from another posit package) and not something I get...

Ok, some first results are [in this log file](https://github.com/RcppCore/rcpp-logs/blob/master/results/Rcpp-20251028.txt). It looks worse than it likely is as a) there are the usual 'new' packages for which I have to add...

Hm. And I mean **Hmm** here. An incremental run (after adding all the packages listed as missing, and running against everything not passing in first one, i.e. those who were...

Mind you maybe it is just like @Enchufa2 hinted: a simple `compileAttributes()` and we're good. That worked here: ```sh edd@paul:~/git/rcppsimdjson(master)$ tt.r -f inst/tinytest/test_fparse_fload.R test_fparse_fload.R........... 8 tests OK terminate called after...

Rebased, and ran another incremental run. Results summary in this commit: https://github.com/RcppCore/rcpp-logs/commit/ef3a42fa768e0b780be72a28e36841e353f1314b containing the [summary file](https://github.com/RcppCore/rcpp-logs/blob/master/results/Rcpp-20251104.txt). This is a bit more involved than usual: - a fair number clearly fall...

Ok -- we are in fact having issues here. The `RcppEigen` fail is not local to the machine, I just reproduced it in a container locally here for package `BayesProject`...