Dirk Eddelbuettel
Dirk Eddelbuettel
Closing for lack of follow-up as well as lack of a _minimally complete verifiable example_.
I am not sure, I would recommend comparing to other packages using Modules. I just looked at one of mine and it does not use `.factory` (but `.constructor`). This may...
Intriguing, and potentially very interesting. Paging @jjallaire who is of course the main author of the 'Attributes' code.
Sorry for keeping you waiting on this! As you may have seen we were quite busy establishing a new baseline of C++11 removing some older (now unused) code paths from...
That's helpful. But what might be even better is more examples. Even for the simple declaration. I see some of these used in your `testpkg` (in the initial version, may...
Oh I completely see where it could be useful -- fully agreed. We have some use cases where Rcpp Modules, and some where it could not get used, and something...
Thanks. Might it make sense to put the example package(s) into a separate repo for easier access and study?
I sent you a quick PR for `testRcpp`. Feel free to ignore or to adapt partially, but I have a pretty strong dislike of `using namespace ...` in package code....
I just noticed that when I run `compileAttributes()` in your `testRcppNew` I get a change to `RcppExports.cpp` that seems odd. ```diff diff --git i/src/RcppExports.cpp w/src/RcppExports.cpp index bdc1385..13359a3 100644 --- i/src/RcppExports.cpp...
My bad. I have a checkout here but I was stuck in your older master and not the new branch. All good once I get to that branch.