Dirk Eddelbuettel

I hear you, and I had worse / similar constraints. You'll have to be creative and see what you can do -- docker can help. But keep in mind that...

> that modify how your package is built, especially if you use Rcpp or so. Nice unsubstantiated conjecture you have there. How R builds things is well documented and understood,...

Without a [minimally complete verifiable example](https://stackoverflow.com/help/minimal-reproducible-example) it is just hearsay amounting to FUD as we have nothing to work with. If you truly want to make things better (given how...

@nuest Yes, planned as the next blog post. Didn't get to it yet :)

Here is a short write up. Let me know if it is helpful and/or comprehensible: http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com/blog/2017/12/22#014_finding_binary_deb_packages

I am also a little undecided about wheter it is better for reproducability. On the one hand it "fixes" one more moving part: rebuilding a container gets you more things...

(Came here late via the commit you just made.... thanks for that) > So what do you use for standard Date and POSIXct manipulation? `anytime::anydate()` and `anytime::anytime()` really do all...

Good question. Over the course of the four related markdown-to-latex packages tint, pinp, binb and linl we have learned how to parameterise a few things. In essence, we can pick...

Reproducible example, please, or the bug report may not exist...

Oh, I see now. That may be a pandoc interaction. I guess we can add 'allow for email address' as a feature request. I suspect it may be easiest to...