Ed Bratt

You can follow this Eclipse GlassFish issue: https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/glassfish/issues/22598 (I just searched for 22407, in the GitHub search) On 1/30/2019 7:51 AM, Philip Durbin wrote: > > Congrats on the first...

Is this a new problem? What version are you using now?

FWIW, I looked quickly at the deploy preview and the site update looks really nice! It might be useful to update the Marketing Committee with a note about this progress...

Is this a request to produce a list of committer members to each EE4J Project, qualified by the committer member organizations that listed on the membership/members page? (i.e. for Red...

So, this would be the uniqued list of everyone listed on all the EE4J project "Who is involved" pages (minus the mentors, I guess). Correct? That number is approaching 200...

If this is valuable, it may be valuable to other working groups. Perhaps also consider if this would make sense at the working group home-page (e.g.https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/ee4j). Generating this list manually...

Committer lists don't change much. I'm not sure you need to do this for every new deployment. If it's not time-consuming, probably that doesn't matter. But if this query is...

No TCK should be released without at least one implementation proving compatibility so, the clause above would always be true. To me, it doesn't make sense to file a 'challenge'...

There are several paths to accomplish this -- If you want to just extract it into a separate specification, you will need to create a TCK (or refactor from the...

> [CN4J Report.pdf](https://github.com/jakartaee/jakartaee-platform/files/12466021/CN4J.Report.pdf) @JanWesterkamp-iJUG this is a great resource! Is there any way to provide the graphs in a way that they are more readable? The colored graph, figure 6,...