earthgecko

@alikhtag there is a workaround described in https://github.com/graphite-project/graphite-web/issues/2566 For now a simple workaround is to use virtualenv 16.7.10 if you can. **If you know what you are doing** and you...

@bluesea2013 Does your browser use something like noscript or have any other security plugins/extensions running or security settings? This looks very similar to when a browser is running noscript and...

@malmaud OK I guess you obviously have a better grasp of what is "common" to a new user than I do. However given that this is a wrapper to Pandas...

This should probably close #89

Hi Abe No it seems fine... I hope, although that you raised the question makes me wonder :) Crazy feedback loop, I do see what you are saying, however although...

Hi Abe Having assessed further, there is some _crazy_ feedback, although I am not certain the feedback exaggeration is any worse than: `+ NUMBER_OF_ALGORITHMS + 1` I was thinking maybe:...

Hi Abe The results are in and it appears that there is a small but noticable difference in the total_anomalies when skyline.analyzer.anomaly_breakdown in **not** the `SKIP_LIST` When analyzing the skyline.analyzer.anomaly_breakdown,...

The plot thickens, there was me thinking that my SKIP_LIST had applied, I forget that SKIP_LIST does not get applied in analyzer but rather in horizon (which I did not...

Hi Abe The status quo is maintained, in the context of the skyline feedback with the `'skyline.analyzer.anomaly_breakdown.'` in the `SKIP_LIST` being applied, the graphs visually look very similar, no exaggerated...

@asafcombo, @astanway is correct it could be done with some customisation and in terms of hard coding the server metric names, you could instead match on the namespace and then...