Rahul Chauhan

> > However, the big question that will help us taking the proper direction here is how Rucio Server deals with `DuplicateContent` exception? Does it add everything in our HTTP...

> one to deal with chunks on a client side (as is implemented now), and another is to allow server handle entire dids in chunks and return generic status of...

@vkuznet What is the max number of dids that we are talking about without any chunking? And why is there an issue with duplication if say, we need to send...

Hello @amaltaro In such a case, none of the 10 dids will be attached. The transaction will not be committed if any of the dids result in an exception.

Before beginning these iterations, can you not do a `list_contents` call first? - let's call its results as `set A`; Then we have a list of new children to attach...

@amaltaro I think I do not understand what MSPileup cycles do to be able to remove the duplicate children that were present in this step. > 5\. attach the third...

I can create an issue with Rucio and discuss changing the current implementation to make the `attach_dids` call idempotent. But this process can take time. Is this what we want...

Hello, I just hit this issue. I cannot set the `availability_write` to `True`. Is there a workaround to initiate transfers?

But isn't `ignore_availability` meant to override that? Is it only meant to enable the rule creation but still not proceed with the transfer submission?

Hello @dchristidis Thank you very much. I was unaware of a separate `ignore_availability` in the conveyor config. I understood your point about this being about the error message. I was...