dy102
dy102
It seems the first step is to decouple SeaTunnel from Hazelcast by extracting a small interface layer. cc @zhangshenghang @davidzollo
> Good suggestion. Can you write a proposal for this big feature? you can refer the [#2274](https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/issues/2274) Sure, I’ll prepare a proposal for this feature. Thanks for the guidance!
Hi @zhangshenghang @davidzollo . PTAL when you have time, thanks!
> > Hi @zhangshenghang @davidzollo . PTAL when you have time, thanks! > > @dybyte hi，check why the CI failed CI has passed.
@zhangshenghang Sorry, I think this needs a bit more work, so I'll convert it to draft for now..
I organized my thoughts and submitted an updated change. Sorry for the confusion — this issue is a bit subtle and tricky.
Hi @zhangshenghang. PTAL when you have time. Thanks!
> I have a question about the behavior when a job is already stuck in the DOING_SAVEPOINT state. In that case, can stopPipelineWithCheckpointFallback always successfully stop the job and release...
I’ve sent an email to the dev mailing list to discuss this PR.
Could you enable CI following the [instructions](https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/10134/checks?check_run_id=56761532175)?