[Improve][Zeta] Introduce MapStorage interface to decouple from Hazelcast IMap

[dybyte]

Search before asking

• [x] I had searched in the feature and found no similar feature requirement.

Description

The engine currently has many components that directly depend on Hazelcast IMap. To reduce this tight coupling and make it easier to introduce alternative storage implementations (e.g., RocksDB) in the future, I’m considering introducing a MapStorage abstraction layer.

For the full discussion, please see the Apache dev mailing list.

Usage Scenario

No response

Related issues

#9851

Are you willing to submit a PR?

• [x] Yes I am willing to submit a PR!

Code of Conduct

• [x] I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct

[davidzollo]

Good suggestion. Can you write a proposal for this big feature? you can refer the https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/issues/2274

[dybyte]

Good suggestion. Can you write a proposal for this big feature? you can refer the #2274

Sure, I’ll prepare a proposal for this feature. Thanks for the guidance!