Daniel Reeves

Something like this maybe for the implementation? Let me know your thoughts. I'm motivated by this issue because we need to exclude an endpoint here. We currently use some weird...

For Python < 3.9 you can just suggest that users define a decorator at the module scope to gain access to those functions. It loses a bit of its elegance...

I ran into the first issue as well. Wrapping my WSGI app with `werkzeug.middleware.proxy_fix.ProxyFix` did the trick. I actually had no idea this was a Meinheld issue. But, I just...

Totally missed that in the readme. The existing default behavior is defensible for the case of `flask db migrate --help` specifically, it feels a little overkill that it follows through...

I should have been clearer! ### `flask db migrate --help` Normally I would expect a list of all the subcommands plus a description of the default behavior, like a typical...

> Q: Does this propoosal make any changes in SecretsBackend interface (common for all the Secret Backends) or can it be done exclusively in the Amazon Provider without changing Secrets...

Sorry it's so much! I think the **Examples** section is the clearest explanation of what the issues are with the current `SecretsManagerBackend` implementation. And yes, it is a small #...

Busy last few weeks for me, but I'll be getting to this soon.

@FishmanL seems like the issue is that pytest-flask-sqlalchemy hasn't been updated in Pypi. https://pypi.org/project/pytest-flask-sqlalchemy/#history The issue should be resolved with the latest commit, just needs to be pushed to Pypi.

I'm currently testing my implementation for the Amazon Provider package change #25432. The one thing I have noticed so far is that the `Connection` object returned is missing a `conn_id`....