Dimitri van Hees
Dimitri van Hees
Added `wontfix` label because it's out of scope.
Reopened for further discussion, we'll use the Projects feature to determine scope.
The `name` field is meant for convencience only and is a human readable name of the document (just like `description`). I think the resourceId is part of the actual resource...
I don't really understand the problem. I think the implementer should use it's own identifier(s).
@moscicki it is indeed intentional as the create call is a 'fire and forget' call. The receiving party might have removed the incoming share without notifying the sending party. This...
We can add a global permission field but this will not give any guarantees. If, for example, the global permission for a share is `read-only` but the protocol options provide...
True, but it can also be a mistake in the request. Imagine I send a global permission `read-only` and the protocol specific permission mechanism doesn't match this global permission, then...
I agree. But, in the case of a file, would you also like to know what kind of file it is? E.g. the mime-type of the file to be able...
So we should introduce a non-enumerated filetype field?
Added the `wontfix` label because it's out of scope.