Dusty Mabe

I think we can close this. We are shipping ppc64le FCOS and RHCOS.

This overlaps a bit with the newly created tracker issue https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/1639 that @jbtrystram is working on. I'll close this out and we'll track it there.

> > isnt kexec is hardware dependent as well? > > Is it? I wasn't aware of that. Yeah. I don't think it is hardware dependent. IIUC `kdump` uses `kexec`...

at least the search part of this seems to be taken care of now with https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/docs-fp-o/c/4b7021833da64fd651feffeaf6de1401a89531b0?branch=prod I see a search box in the top right. It's not google search, but...

weird. we do have a [test day](https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/1685) coming up so I imagine a few more people will try out this process and we'll see if they have luck then.

For example, as of today the output includes: ``` Downgraded: ethtool 2:5.17-1.fc35 -> 2:5.16-2.fc36 runc 2:1.1.1-1.fc35 -> 2:1.1.0-2.fc36 squashfs-tools 4.5.1-1.fc35 -> 4.5-18.20220221gitbc0c097.fc36 vim-data 2:8.2.4701-1.fc35 -> 2:8.2.4621-1.fc36 vim-minimal 2:8.2.4701-1.fc35 -> 2:8.2.4621-1.fc36...

Exactly. This was the start of that. I wanted to get my steps down and then someone (or maybe me) can pick it up and push it forward. This was...

Nice. Thanks for working on this. Yes if we could update overrides.py to handle packages that are specific to particular architectures that would cause us much less pain not only...

@hrismarin - would you be interested in trying this out? it would basically be something like https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-coreos/os-extensions/ but with an `rpm-ostree override remove moby-engine` first

> Will this be in the FAQ or on a separate page? I'm in favor of a separate page, so we can give the necessary instructions and example config. @hrismarin...