Christian Folini
Christian Folini
Thanks for reporting @kvibber and bonus points for returning status code 418. Thanks for the link to w3.org, @tsmethurst. @kvibber, you seem to be using CRS 3.2.x. Would you mind...
Thanks for the update. A lot of modules have problems, we are sure. But little reports and even fewer contributions to help with maintaining a rule exclusion plugin for CRS....
> My initial thought is to create a rule exclusion plugin for ActivityPub, I don't think this should be part of core. Why? If it's a new standard headed for...
Decisions: * We are not going to participate in GSoC this year. Lack of capacity, new release coming in and also mixed experiences in the past. * CRS release still...
So I can add `#:~:text=` to the Referer to bypass this rule? Is it really worth the fight this PL2 FP? I mean just how frequent is this right now?...
@theMiddleBlue : > Fragment can go inside the Referer header and it's really common actually. I do not think the fragment should be included in the Referer and I do...
:rofl: Well ... I find the evidence points in all sorts of directions.
I thought it did not exist, I saw that it should not exist. And now you bring evidence that it does indeed exist. Is it limited to certain User Agents?...
I second that. Let's ignore it here, get this over and create an issue to tackle fragment after CRS v4 is out.
How do we proceed here? We have a separate issue to check for bypasses thanks to this rule extension (see 2nd comment above) and it's thus safe to merge this...