Ate Eskola
Ate Eskola
> 've quickly checked godbolt for clang behavior: https://cpp.godbolt.org/z/4vKq93d4n > > => int is 16-bit for AVR, so no promotion to 32-bit. This is C++ though, which allows varying `int`...
> I propose you write a DIP - or something similar - about how 8/16bit D should work I'm thinking about writing another forum post for that, trying to get...
Limiting promotion alone doesn't help that much, because literals are still `int`s. What could work to solve at least these two cases is [Adam's proposal for changing value range propagation...
Got it finally done. Here: https://forum.dlang.org/post/[email protected] > I guess it'd all come down to estimating how long these pre-32-bit architectures are going to be relevant before becoming ancient history Personally...
> Moreover, it's unfortunate that the template parameter useDIP1000 was recently added I don't think you need to worry about breakage when moving that to last position of the parameter...
> > During the Dec 8 DLF monthly meeting, Walter was in favor of putting different OS'es (Windows, Linux, FreeBSD, macOS) in different folders. > > To clarify, the idea...
> Seems, there's nothing can do about it: something has to take over version(..) functionality. Yes, didn't mean that as criticism. Just that I'd prefer if we could use the...
I'm currently playing with LDC on AVR. Bumped into this issue and did a bit of experimentation, gaining some insight. Since D is designed for 32-bit architectures and up, it'd...
> iirc the eventual plan is to require that return be written directly before the attribute it modifies (either as return ref or return scope), but disallowing ref return is...
> Since Nix always uses the specified versions of the dependencies, more likely than not the libraries (like SDL / OpenGL) do differ between my 2.0.1 and 2.1.0. Should this...