Don Syme
Don Syme
This can be captured, yes, we should treat this as an FCS/ fantomas bug
The docs and spec should be updated, thanks
Cool, I batch these up :)
I'm running through the style guide questions in this repo at last. I agree with @isaacabraham that at option (4) listed above should be an option. I personally would be...
> The main issue with this persistence mode is that you need to potentially format each clause to see if it is multiline or not. This feels expensive to check,...
Decision on (4) is here: https://github.com/fsharp/fslang-design/issues/663
On (2) I agree, ideally we should never break namespaces, I think under any circumstances. However it will be difficult to implement because namespaces are not known to fantomas. I...
On (3) I'm torn, it's not a simple choice. I'm aware it is a realy problem in practice. There is also a major risk of being inconsistent with functions and...
@auduchinok I've added tupled and mixed cases to the above. What do you think for static members? And is there any reason that case would be different?
@auduchinok basically it seems it is only curried `let` that's a problem for single-indentation, because of the unfortuanate exact alignment between function name and curried arguments. But of course it's...