Don Syme
Don Syme
I'd imagine this is fixed in feature/ext branch, we should check
Smaller repro: ```fsharp type Matrix) = m / m ```
The problem is, I've seen beginner code with literally many of these warnings, and the warning turned off. I started searching for stuff in github that turns of warning 58,...
I think we should really follow this path for this one: > ....have a flag `--strict:SOME-FEATURE-NAME` that is turned on by default in new project templates.... There will 100% be...
I mean I guess an alternative would be to parse all sources twice, and see if the warning occurs anywhere. If not then go ahead with the better parser. Anyway,...
I'll mark it as approved. By approving I mean if the feature applies then this strawman (please let's capture this very precisely): * make the "offside warning" into a hard...
> On the parser side, this change should only require adding/changing recovery rules, like the ones I've been adding recently, not changing normal case ones. It should have no more...
Matthew please feel free to make a trial implementation. However I think we would not include the indexed or indexOf..Where. The former because there are other functions that would get...
@matthewcrews Yes, that makes sense.
There are many Seq functions like that, including Seq.exists for example. So we should include Seq