dspdon

Thanks Daniel. I could use some insight: are the tests in the testvectors_v1 folder newer/better than those in the testvectors folder? --Don

Thanks again Daniel. I'm now running the test cases in the "v1" folder. The KWP test cases in v1 all seem to be fine with regard to this setting ---...

Sorry, I believe I opened this in error.

I paused on this issue due to some insight I was receiving from Daniel regarding a KW and a KWP issue I opened. However, I see a different basis for...

Thanks - I ran those radix85 test cases, they work fine. Will you be able to regenerate the base85 test with a unique alphabet? It would be nice to have...

Hi Daniel Attached please find an updated version of aes_ff1_base85_test.json. It is a regeneration based on the radix85 file, and uses an updated alphabet to produce a new base85 file....

Joachim, I hope you don't mind: I'm an interested third-party, not affiliated with NIST. I ran your set of test cases above on an independent implementation of GCM-SIV. I confirmed...

Same set of 18 failed test cases that I see. Thanks for confirming this, and for the link to the PR you opened. Nice job on that.

A bit more to add to this. I can move this to a separate issue if you feel it is distinct. The json test files for SHA2-384 ([internalProjection.json](https://github.com/usnistgov/ACVP-Server/blob/master/gen-val/json-files/SHA2-384-1.0/internalProjection.json)), SHA2-512 ([internalProjection.json](https://github.com/usnistgov/ACVP-Server/blob/master/gen-val/json-files/SHA2-512-1.0/internalProjection.json)),...

I downloaded the updated test files and ran them against my systems. All looks good. Thanks again for making these updates. --DonOn Oct 7, 2024, at 1:03 PM, livebe01 ***@***.***>...