Derek Schuff
Derek Schuff
This should be fixed by https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/pull/21987
There is one important potential complication here: **~2~ 1 of the 3 browsers have already shipped this method as part of the legacy exception proposal.** (even though none have shipped...
Oops, looks like I forgot I had the "experimental WebAssembly" flag enabled when I tested chrome 😅. I updated the OP
/cc @past @ajklein
Results of accessibility [questionnaire](https://w3c.github.io/apa/fast/checklist.html) moved to https://github.com/WebAssembly/spec/issues/1805
Thanks, I'll push it back.
For review convenience, here is a list of the explainers for the proposals that have gone into 2.0, compared to 1.0 (currently in REC state). These are informal descriptions of...
CR transition is complete. Feedback is still welcome of course.
Thanks for working on this, I am happy to see this addition as well! Another use case for add-with-overflow is the one that motivates the checked arithmetic [builtins](https://clang.llvm.org/docs/LanguageExtensions.html#checked-arithmetic-builtins) in C...
Hm, good point about the comparing the result to the operands; I was thinking of what checked-math libraries typically do in C, where that's exactly what you can't do because...