David Sarrut
David Sarrut
Positron range simulation - inconsistency between GATE 8.0/ 9.0/ literature and between source types
Hi Minh, thanks again to providing this issue. I tried to understand and finally did 2 things: - a new PR (#395) in order to output the TrackLength in the...
Positron range simulation - inconsistency between GATE 8.0/ 9.0/ literature and between source types
Hello, I finally try a new "AnnihilationRangeActor" that store 3D position at annihilation. See here : #400 (and [this file](https://github.com/OpenGATE/Gate/blob/e%2B_range_actor/source/digits_hits/src/GateAnnihilationRangeActor.cc)). With 18F, I obtained (100k events, 13 sec computation time):...
Positron range simulation - inconsistency between GATE 8.0/ 9.0/ literature and between source types
Hello, the benchmark https://github.com/OpenGATE/GateBenchmarks/tree/master/t3_range_e%2B is dealing with this topic. Please, have a look and comment if needed. For the moment, we consider "historical" range as reference. This is not fully...
Hi Chiara, is this issue resolved? thanks David
Discussion are still pending inside the collaboration about the GPU parts in Gate. Not sure yet if it will be maintained/enhanced or removed.
Hello, could you try with 9.1 please? And check benchmark t10 : https://github.com/OpenGATE/GateBenchmarks/tree/master/t10_SpectroGamma thanks
Hi @andiresch and @GuardiolaC, did you manage to discuss about the SpectrumActor ? thanks David
perfect 👍 ;) !
thanks a lot, no problem (nothing urgent)!
Are you sure Tom ? You think it is related to floating point representation ? @djboersma @BishopWolf : yes the actors and input volumes are different. But the actor, if...