Paul Ralph
Paul Ralph
If possible, it would be great if LaTeX kit preserve bold and italics from the source text by surrounding the relevant passages with \textbf{} and italicized text with \textit{} in...
The systematic review standard should be divided into at least three standards for meta-analysis, case survey, critical review, meta-synthesis. Somewhere we need to explain that ad hoc reviews, rapid reviews...
In definition? Title? What's the best way to do this?
Clarify that structured interviews are methodologically equivalent to questionnaire surveys.
As a checklist user, I want the essential attributes to be organized by where they typically appear in papers rather than by the standard they're drawn from So I don't...
https://openreview.net/ has an open API, which might be easier to work with than HotCRP or Easychair.
Create a flow chart or decision tree to help users determine which standard(s) to select. (Suggestions welcome).
We need some kind of recommendations for reviewing a method for which there is no existing standard, such that a reviewer can click "other" in the reviewer checklist generator and...
Create a standard for qualitative simulations including: - Protocol studies / Protocol analysis - quasi-experimental simulations of the sorts used with undergraduate students - usability studies like heuristic walkthroughs, cognitive...
As an editor (of the standards) I want to write custom follow-up questions for some, but not all, essential criteria, So that I can better guide reviewer decision-making. For example,...