Maurizio Montel

Hi @Dpananos I made a check, and I confirm Canada code is working as expected: the difference between it and the other countries is it applies observance by default: ```...

Hi @bkthomps , thank you for your contribution. Regarding your last request (failure threshold) it is in fact meant to keep coverage level at the pre-existing state, so that's why...

Hi @bkthomps, thank you for your notes and suggestions.. I've updated the coverage threshold and merged your PR in beta. KUTGW

Hi @arkid15r thank you! Although I understand that, being read-only, tuples would be more appropriate to retain subdivision data, we should always aim to keep compatibility with our previous versions...

> @dr-prodigy Quick question (mostly for self-education), but what kind of break do you envision? Both lists and tuples are Iterables, so I can't think of any, but have less...

Hi @YusufBerki , sorry, I have to agree with @arkid15r : although well documented, your PR doesn't add so much value, but instead enforces a dependency (even if not strict)...

Hey Mike @mborsetti nope, not really anything more .. I'm just been very late at receiving updates in these weeks! Now merged, thx 👍

Hi @mborsetti does what shared on #704 sort this out too? Thx!

Okay @mborsetti , that's the confirmation I was asking for. Closing due to what explained on #704 , thank you very much! 👍

hi everyone! @arkid15r thank you so much for the complete explanation. Indeed, providing a complete issue report (with an enclosed code sample, whenever possible) is vital to obtain valuable support....